Dear #radfem2013 Intersectionality Is Essential

Dear #Radfem2013

I have been watching your hashtag with interest over the past few days as I know you've been having a conference. Let me say I like a lot of what you say and in my dark hours, I have actually thought I might want to join you.

But I can't. And that isn't my fault, it's yours. And it makes me really sad. Not for me, I'm more than happy in my feminism thanks, but for you who must know, deep down, that you will never achieve what you want because, believe it or not, you are not about equality for women.

I hope you were sat down for that. I can almost hear your bristling and outrage. And I'm ready for whatever backlash you want to throw at me. But I'm not actually expecting any to be honest because as an intersectional feminist, I am beneath your intellectual notice. Though you are not above pouring scorn and hatred on my ilk.

You exclude me, and feminism shouldn't, fuck it, DOESN'T work like that.

So, here is why I don't want to be part of your faux revolution.

I am a woman who understands that every woman, regardless of gender assignment at birth is my sister. No, she wasn't 'born a man', she was born a woman. And no, escaping misogyny for most of her life (are you fucking shitting me here? It is patriarchy that means so many trans* women commit suicide) does not mean that she is a threat to women only spaces because she brings a male perspective. We don't punish women for being women. I say 'we', I mean us intersectional feminists. You still see them as 'chicks with dicks' and you should be ashamed.

I have a boyfriend. He is a man. He is also the best feminist ally you could hope for. He listens to us without trying to fix us. He doesn't try to tell us what we need. He never judges. He will debate our issues with us to understand them so he can help in a way that we want him to, not in a way that makes it look like he knows best because he is a man. He will challenge misogyny and not accept it in his presence. He will educate other men. He will not mansplain. He believes that women deserve equality as a default, NOT because men would bestow it upon us as a gift. He is an ally, and there are many more like him.

Yet you would write him off as TEH MENZ and call him TEH PROBLEMZ.

You really don't like gay men do you? You think that they hate women and are all about the misogyny themselves. You miss the point that their struggle is equal to our struggle and that we might have something to learn from each other. And that they are actually, in the main, our allies too. You see they understand about being oppressed. It wasn't that long ago that being themselves actually meant prison. And dammit, they know how to campaign and organise. Talk to them, you might surprise yourselves.

You talk about gynecology being born from vivisection of slaves. But that seems to be as far as you would go to talk about Women of Colour. I don't deny this, but that same gynecology saves millions of women's lives. So what is your point? Ah yes, that TEH MENZ WAZ EVILZ. *yawn*. Talk about the rape of women of colour, but what campaigns do you actually support to help?

Getting more and more angry here and that wasn't my intention, so will give you the last reason I want nothing to do with your ridiculous, bigoted, hateful organisation.

I am the mother of two boys. They are good men who understand our issues and will fight to make sure that we get the equality due to us. I cannot reconcile your hatred and mistrust of men with the ones I have raised. And here is the crux of the matter, when they are arguing on our behalf with other men who don't get feminism and do need educating it is you that gets thrown at them as an example of why feminism is a BAD thing.

It is you that gets thrown at them as an example of feminism being full of man hating psychos who hate everyone to be honest. It isn't us who spend our time educating, protesting outside abortion clinics when the disgusting 40 Days Of Life are harassing women. It isn't us who are trying our hardest to affect change in the Left because we understand that holding ourselves separate from them isn't going to achieve anything. No, it isn't us who understand that without intersectionality our fight means NOTHING.

It is you who is doing the feminist movement damage.

And that is why I can't join you, no matter how much I would want to.

Grow up a bit and we'll talk. Hope that can be soon.

Your sister,

Goddessdeeva.

Happy Pills. On Depression And Medication

Read a really good article in the Independent about the language around anti depressant medication. It was ever so good and it got me thinking about attitudes about actually taking them.

I've been on them for about two years now. I've talked in previous blogs about how I've had counselling, but not about my meds.

So maybe it's time.

Like I say, I've been on Prozac for two years now. It's something I'm used to and something that doesn't embarrass me now. It did though. It seemed like I'd failed somehow. That by not coping I was admitting that I was lesser.

Took me a long while to start taking them for a few reasons.

I was worried about turning into an emotionless drone. Which was ironic as I was feeling nothing but sad, bone crushingly sad, all the time. I could have done with switching that off if I'm honest.

I was also worried about being artificially happy. Joy is a thing I cherish. I embrace it, revel in it. Bathe in the glow of it and savour the memory if it as I go to sleep.

I didn't want that to be fake. It was too important to risk it like that.

The thing was, I was finding no joy in anything. Everything was dark and heavy and pointless and stupid. I was dark and heavy and pointless and stupid.

So I went on the 'happy pills'.

What a misnomer. They didn't make me happy. PEOPLE made me happy. They just gave me the mental headspace to allow that to happen. I didn't actually realise how well they were working until I found myself laughing spontaneously. What a moment that was!

I wasn't an emotionless drone. I was still feeling them, but when it was APPROPRIATE for me to do so. What a revelation!! When I was happy I felt happy. When I was sad I felt sad.

Might seem a small thing but to me it was everything. I understood that my medication was keeping me level so that I could function, and more than that, live and feel.

Yet still I fell into the trap.

The trap of thinking I had to come off the meds as soon as possible. I tried it in the summer. I had just moved in with The Lovely, I was ridiculously happy in my new city with my new man and I loved my new office and my new team. Life was positive.

So I stopped taking the Prozac.

I ended up so poorly that I thought a city hated me. I wasn't coping with the aspects of my work that weren't as positive as they could be. I cried A LOT. The Lovely got very good at walking on eggshells. I found myself unable to get out of bed on sunny days so I went back to the doctor and went back on the meds.

I'm more open about my need for antidepressants these days. It's not the first thing I say, but I'm not shy about it.

I get asked 'aren't they just a crutch?'. Here's the thing. Would you take a crutch away frI'm someone with a broken leg? Didn't think so.

And no, it isn't a crutch, it's a treatment. Would you take medication away from diabetics? No. I didn't think so.

Neither am I mentally deficient. That was a nice one.

And I don't know how long I'll be on them. As long as it takes I suppose, even if that is forever.

So what is the point of this post? For me it is a catharsis to write about this stuff. And I hope that it helps even one person understand what depression and taking meds is like for me.

It won't be the same for everyone though. Know how you'll find out how it is for them? Ask them. We're one in four so we aren't hard to find.

DEEVA FOR POPE!

Let me start off by saying I couldn't give a flying fuck about religion. If you want to believe in a big bearded man in the sky who gets angry when you wank then all power to you. It's not for me, and I'm sure if there is a god then they have better things to do than watch me fantasize over Angelina Jolie. Or maybe not, judging by the state of the planet.

But I digress.

One thing I can believe in is the Pope. Not in him being gods representative in earth natch, but in him as a man with a pretty cushty job.

One he has decided to resign from.

So here is my pitch for the job. Laying aside the fact that I'm a woman and a lapsed Catholic (REALLY lapsed) I think I'd be aces at it.

So here are the things I'd do if I got the job.

1. I'd sell off the Vatican treasures and solve world hunger.

2. Let the African nations know that a loving god would prefer to have them use a condom than die.

3. Women bishops? Sure thing.

4. Abortion on demand? Yep, it's your body, you do what is best for you sisters.

5. *whispers* hey, paedo priests. Coming for ya. Gonna turn the whole lot of you over to the police. Rot in hell you sick fucks.

6. Equal marriage. Yep, you can have that. Love is love. Not sure what the last guy was on about.

7. I'd move the Holy See to Bristol. Me and The Lovely like it here.

8. I would totally rock the frock and hat.

9. Rather than ask for money in the collection plate I would give money to the poor.

10. I would order people to stop fighting in God's name. It isn't important how you worship, being a good person is the thing.

So vote #deevaforpope

It's not like I could do any worse than the last dude.

Something Rotten In The State of the SWP?

Nick Cohen has written an article on why the left are not good feminists.

What a shame it doesn't actually say an awful lot about feminism.

What is does, purposefully or not, is tar all far left organisations as rapists.

When I saw Cohen's article, it had been tweeted with the accompanying statement 'why the far left rape'. And I couldn't let that go unanswered.

And this is why.

Apart from the fact that the SWP isn't the entirety of the far left, the far left do not rape, it is individuals who rape.

Tarring everyone with the same brush is in itself anti feminist. All it does is enable those who would rape by hiding them in plain sight. If all far left wingers are expected to rape then this is not going to be a problem is it? It is actually, in its own strange way rape apology.

Yes, there has and continues to be something very wrong in the hierarchy of the SWP when a woman who has been brave enough to speak out about rape is not supported, Yes, there is something very wrong when rather than support her through the extremely dicey waters of the British Justice System, a system that we know is anti women and prone to the same rape apology and slut shaming misogyny as the rest of society, they decide to do the 'justice' in house. Yes, there is something very wrong when any subsequent court case would now be tarnished precisely because of this kangaroo court that saw the accused walk free. (aside: what the fuck could they have done but expel him had they found him guilty for fucks sake?)

But you know what?

Not all far left organisations are like that. Cohen tarring them all with the same something is rotten in the state of the SWP brush is wrong headed lazy journalism at best. At worst it is, or at least appears to be a personal axe to grind.

I am not a member of the SWP, nor would I ever condone what has occurred here, but I am a member of a left wing faction in my union. It isn't perfect, not in any way, shape or form but it does take rape very seriously. And is trying to educate itself into being a better feminist ally.

And what of those who hold far left political views who are not in any organisation? Are they just waiting for their chance to rape unsuspecting women? No. Not all of them. And to suggest, even tacitly, that being a far left winger means that you are is offensive, insulting and just plain wrong. Worse, it feeds into the rape culture it is fighting against.

And what of those SWP members who are trying to do the right thing? In an organisation that is as shady as Cohen is trying to paint it we would never have known anything had happened at all. But we have. It has been shouted from the rooftops by those who are defending their female comrades and railing against the very misogynist rape culture that enabled this to happen.

I find myself wondering, is this actually a political issue? (I mean, apart from the fact that feminism, rape, rape culture and misogyny is always political) Is this a left v right thing?

I was asked what I would be saying if it were a right wing organisation. I examined my own bias, as a left winger and came up with this.

I would say that there are some rapists in the far right. I would say that those individuals are responsible for their own behaviour. I would say that rape culture and misogyny had something to do with it. I would point out that misogyny and rape culture are embedded in the policies of the far right in a way that it isn't in the far left. I would also say that though I abhor far right politics with every fibre of my being, see my post on 28,000 votes the BNP got in the London Mayoral Election, that I would applaud anyone who brought this to light.

I would say that this is a right v wrong issue.

And I would applaud anyone who brings misogyny, rape culture, victim blaming or slut shaming to light.

The far left doesn't rape. People rape.

Cohen would do well to remember that.